Combined first trimester nuchal translucency and second trimester biochemical screening tests among normal pregnancies

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 781-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Herman ◽  
Z. Weinraub ◽  
E. Dreazen ◽  
S. Arieli ◽  
S. Rozansky ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Hart ◽  
Barbara M. O’Brien

The FASTER Trial by Malone et al. discusses methods of prenatal genetic screening for Down syndrome. The trial included 15 sites within the United States between 1999 and 2005. This trial was designed to compare the differences in detection rates of Down syndrome when applying screening tests from the first-trimester, second-trimester, or screening tests that combine markers from both trimesters. Screening tests evaluated in this trial include nuchal translucency, serum screen, combined screen, quadruple screen, independent sequential screen, stepwise sequential screen, serum integrated screen, and fully integrated screen. This trial compares detection rates, false positive rates, and timing of results between screening tests.


2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (11) ◽  
pp. 1685-1691
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Palomaki ◽  
George J. Knight ◽  
Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian ◽  
Jacob A. Canick ◽  
James E. Haddow

Abstract Context.—We initiated a voluntary, self-funded interlaboratory comparison program in the fall of 2005 because no proficiency testing program was available to laboratories in North America offering first-trimester, combined serum and ultrasound, Down syndrome screening. Objectives.—To evaluate the first 4 years of the interlaboratory comparison program against stated goals, to identify areas of concern, and to create new initiatives as indicated. Design.—Five serum samples are distributed 3 times a year to be tested for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, human chorionic gonadotropin or its β subunit, and dimeric inhibin-A; participants convert these results into multiples of the median. Patient histories include nuchal translucency information that enables the calculation of the risk of Down syndrome. Also included are educational components linked to interlaboratory comparison program results. Assessment of integrated (first- and second-trimester markers) risks is accomplished by having participants combine interlaboratory comparison program results with their results from a second-trimester proficiency testing program administered by the College of American Pathologists. Results.—The precision profile for pregnancy-associated plasma protein A shows decreasing coefficients of variation with increasing pregnancy-associated plasma protein A concentrations and multiples of the median (25% to 11% and 30% to 15%, respectively). In contrast, coefficients of variation are a relatively constant 12% throughout the entire range of human chorionic gonadotropin results. On a logarithmic scale, the median coefficient of variation of the risk of Down syndrome is 9%. Conclusions.—Participants in the interlaboratory comparison program reliably measure analytes, compute multiples of the median, and calculate consistent Down syndrome risks. Assays for the measurement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A are not standardized and are less precise than those for human chorionic gonadotropin. Participants calculate reliable median equations given sonographer-specific sets of paired crown-rump length and nuchal translucency measurements.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
AYSE OZBAN

Abstract Objective: This study aims to determine whether it is possible to predict preeclampsia by comparing postpartum results and test results of the pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia, whose first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and to demonstrate the predictability of severity and week of onset.Background: 204 patients underwent renal transplantation in our center and 84 of them were female. Five of our patients (one of them had two births) gave birth to a total of 6 pregnancies.Method: 135 patients were diagnosed with preeclampsia and their first and/or second trimester screening tests were accessible, and 366 control participants gave birth to a healthy baby between 37-41 weeks after standard follow-up period for pregnancy and their screening tests were also accessible.Results: The study results show that the first trimester maternal serum PAPP-A level is significantly low in preeclamptic pregnant women, and that the second trimester maternal serum AFP and hCG levels are significantly high and uE3 levels are significantly low The results also suggest that the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers can be used in preeclampsia screening.Conclusion: Among these markers, uE3 is the parameter which affects the possibility of preeclampsia the most. However, the first and second trimester Down syndrome biochemical markers are not effective in predicting the severity and onset week of preeclampsia.


Author(s):  
Tamara Illescas ◽  
Waldo Sepulveda ◽  
Begona Adiego ◽  
Pilar Martinez-Ten

ABSTRACT In the last 20 years, the role of first-trimester ultrasound screening has expanded from individual calculation of the risk of aneuploidy through measurement of the nuchal translucency to a powerful technique to evaluate important aspects of the fetal anatomy. Traditionally, the full anatomy scan for detection of structural anomalies has been performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. However, with the implementation of the first-trimester scan at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation many of the structural anomalies traditionally detected in the second trimester can now be identified earlier in pregnancy. In the first part of this review we discuss the main ultrasound findings that may facilitate the prenatal detection of fetal brain, face and neck abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy. How to cite this article Sepulveda W, Illescas T, Adiego B, Martinez-Ten P. Prenatal Detection of Fetal Anomalies at the 11- to 13-Week Scan—Part I: Brain, Face and Neck. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;7(4):359-368.


2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 234-234
Author(s):  
K. Natasa ◽  
Z. Mikovic ◽  
M. Marinkovic ◽  
B. Damnjanovic-Pazin ◽  
Z. Milovanovic ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Miguelez ◽  
M. De Lourdes Brizot ◽  
A. W. Liao ◽  
M. H. B. De Carvalho ◽  
M. Zugaib

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document